I often wonder how I've even made it this far. Seriously. We're nearing the 1 year mark of my first publication and, as I look back nostalgically and such, I simply can't figure out how I've been so damn lucky. I've done this with 0% help from marketers, editors, consultants, publishers (Ok, well if you consider Lulu a publisher, then yes, they've been such a GIANT help), etc. And 100% support from my closest supporters (friends & family) and the many R.T. fans out there. But not every decision I make as a start-up author is pretty. Sometimes they are met with the gritting of teeth and exposing of claws. One of these decisions is the editing process:
I did my research (long, boisterous hours of research) and came to this conclusion. As a self-published author, I had a choice of these 2 options:
1) Hire an editor. Spend long hours and incredible amounts of money to make sure my manuscript is complete and polished. Be in debt right from the beginning.
2) Do it yourself. Spend ten times the amount of time working through your manuscript, but sacrifice when you realize you can't fix everything with one set of eyes. THERE WILL BE MISTAKES...and sometimes FREQUENTLY.

This is pretty much what I looked like when I tried to make this decision.
Do I suffer now or later? What kind of decision is that?
So I made an executive decision: this is my story and I will edit myself.
I wanted to involve my readers in a way that is different than simply sitting down and reading a novel on a Sunday afternoon. Let's be honest, you can get that anywhere. And sure, a 100% polished story is what people look for these days when searching for a "great" book.
But why shouldn't I take advantage of the fact that most of my readers are local and know me well or, at least, by acquaintance. Sure, my readership will expand. In fact, I expect it to soon, but it must build first from the very bottom--the foundation at the local level.
So that sweaty man from above turned into this dude:

Sample questions running through my mind at this point in my decision making: Will I lose credibility with my audience if there are mistakes in the book? Will word get out that I'm a horrible writer? Will my writing career be over?
Answers? 1) Maybe a little bit, 2) Probably not, and 3) NO.
----------------- ----------------------- -------------------------
If you bought a 1st edition of Walls or The Reaper Trials or plan on doing so, this will explain why you have found grammar mistakes as you read.
A first edition of early R.T. Donlon novels are essentially 90,000-99,000 word finished manuscripts that I have read over sixteen times. Yes, that is no joke. I read my stories sixteen times in order to prevent as many grammatical mistakes as possible. And yet, even after I have read the story for so long, there are mistakes that are hidden that my eyes skip over because I'm so used to the story.
This is where my readers come in.
Yes, you.
People have asked to read the novel and act as a makeshift editor for free, and although this sounds great, different people have differing opinions about content and grammar, which can play a weird perspective game with the story. I'm looking for something more community-based here. Something that won't change perspective, ideas, or even the way a particular sentence reads. I want as many people involved in this crazy editing process as possible. The more people who are involved, the more I know are truly invested in the story itself.
You all are so good at finding these mistakes, letting me know where they are so I can revise and send out as a 2nd edition. This worked so well with Walls and, so far, it's worked really well with The Reaper Trials. Because these are my first novels AND I have complete confidence in the fact that my writing career will take off (especially when I DO hire an editor and marketer in the future), my 1st edition purchases will serve as a piece of R.T. Donlon history in the future. You can say that you were a part of the very beginning, even after the market grows.
This might sound cheesy or over confident from my perspective, but ladies and gentlemen, I do not intend to stop writing. Words are my life. I see stories as the bridge from me to you and I intend to keep that bridge open until the day I take my last breath. I just can't stop. If there is construction along the way, we fix it and move forward. Kind of like this:

Now, with that said, Walls and The Reaper Trials will be the last novels I use this process for. Although it does serve its purpose, I do believe that a story without flaws is the best formatted story, but for now, I think this quirky editing process helps bring my readership together in a weird, etherial way. Does it hurt my credibility? I don't think so, but I'm sure there are some critics out there that aren't too impressed.
I think we'll look back at these two start-up R.T. Donlon novels in years to come and smile, knowing that we were part of something fun and exciting, especially when bigger things start flowing down the pipeline.
And yes, R.T. Donlon fans, those things are coming. Very. Very. Soon.
1st Edition Copies of The Reaper Trials are still available for a LIMITED TIME only. Once they're gone, they're gone! If you would like one, contact R.T. directly or purchase a copy through Lulu Marketplace, Amazon, or Barnes & Noble.
2nd Editions will be available in the upcoming months.
-------
2nd Editions of Walls are available through online retailers for your purchasing pleasure.
Until next time,
R.T.

























The book is amazing. It's one part dystopian, three parts philosophical, and ten parts ethical. It raises a million questions about the human experience and dives into the reasoning for living a fruitful life. If you want a rated "R" version of this same plot, check out Equilibrium with Christian Bale. Epic is an understatement. In terms of the movie, however, the only redeeming quality is Jeff Bridges. The protagonist, the story, and the visualization of Lois Lowry's words don't truly come to fruition and it's too bad. I was looking for more investment in the emotional despair, more elation in the moments of emotional awakening, and more disgust in the society's undertakings. Unfortunately, none of that was really present in the film. It makes the list because it's not a bad film entirely, just a predictable one. Plus, they tried way too hard to emerge Taylor Swift as an important character. Come on, The Giver, it doesn't work that way.
Just like The Giver and The Percy Jackson series, Divergent is still in the tier of "novels that are strangely popular and do their jobs, but simply can't keep up with the mainstream ideals and requirements needed to keep the series afloat in film". Will the series continue? Probably. Should it? Meh. I wouldn't really care either way. The plot is similar to every other story we've read about in Young Adult literature, just set in an alternative dystopian setting (see The Giver, The Hunger Games, etc.). Authors need to branch out a bit more and Divergent is a prime example of just that. It's too similar to everything we've seen before, but I can't deny the power it's had on people, particularly the YA's out there, hence its rating - #8.
New tier alert! The Fault in Our Stars reaches the level of "I'm going to make girls cry while doing a pretty good job of enhancing the novel's initial success" of Young Adult books-gone-to-film. There's something magical about how a film can make you feel when you're watching it in the theater. There's something even more magical about having the same reaction while reading a book. The first is a communal effect. The second is a deeply personal experience. Luckily for John Green readers, The Fault in Our Stars accomplished both of these effects pretty successfully. Although I hold true to the fact that Looking For Alaska is still John Green's most powerful work to date, The Fault in Our Stars and its corresponding film are definitely worth investing time into. #7 may be a slight understatement of value here, but with the lengthy list above it, I couldn't see moving it forward any more. Read on, Read on.
The Perks of Being a Wallflower is like The Fault in Our Stars in that it produces the same emotional response, but it's a much more controversial, coming-of-age plot. It dives into non-Young Adult themes (or YA in some circles) like sexuality, drug use, alcohol, along with other familiar Young Adult topics like popularity, discovering passion, and surviving trauma. Chbosky does a fantastic job easing his readers into the lure of YA issues, but also slaps you in the face with background information and exposure. It's one of the few novels that is also directed by the author on the big screen. And besides, Logan Lerman and Emma Watson are fantastic personalities that really allow for the characters to come alive in a very distinct way. If John Green's Looking For Alaska was a movie, The Perks of Being a Wallflower would be on the same level. It's THAT kind of novel/film. The TPOBAW film gave me chills, but then again, I watched it alone. It deserves its rating at #6...the best of the first half of ratings.
This pick may surprise you. Out of all the Young Adult movies out there, why would I choose The Maze Runner as (get this) the #5 Young Adult book-to-movie? I'll tell you why--the movie was absolutely wonderful. The Maze Runner was nothing but a mediocre novel. I'm guessing that The Scorch Trials (#2 in the series) is another work of the same average run-of-the-mill writing bleh, but the movie...the movie was a work of art. When I was listening to the audiobook, I couldn't help but believe that I was reading a male version of the Twilight series. It tried to appeal to the male workings of the brain, but failed miserably. Theresa was a below average character filled with too many loopholes. Thomas was just another conflicted, impersonal mirage of inflated beliefs. And don't even get me started on Alby...but let me tell you something, the film cleared EVERYTHING up. It narrowed Thomas, it expanded the personality of Theresa (although slightly)...and nearly eliminated Alby's character all together. Plot mechanisms were changed, but the overall story remained the same. The Maze Runner completely redid itself and, to be frank, put lipstick on a pig and turned it into a model.
Ah, the top 4. This is where we go from the "rather emotional" to the "marginally epic". Let's be honest. The dystopian setting is not original, but it is a compelling landscape filled with political feuds that resemble our own in distant ways. Katniss is a strong, female character filled with tribulations, hard decisions, and action, while maintaining a soft underbelly of family, friends, and a strong loyalty to the land and people she loves. The movie maintains the story's justice while adding the visual effects needed to make a strong comparison to the novel's crucial details. It's one of the few Young Adult movies that maintains the genre while breaching the realm of adulthood, as well. Well done, Hunger Games. Well done.
Although I'd still mark this as an "above average epic of sorts", I think that Narnia makes for an interesting reach into that "obsessively popular and clearly unavoidable" tier. Yes, it is rather childish, but if you step away and admire the storyline for what it is, you'll see that it is much more than just a children's book. It's a detailed look into the mind of an artist (C.S. Lewis, of course). The movies parallel the books and, for that, I give this bad boy #3 on the depth chart. The movies really allowed for a giant boost of new followers without taking from the writing's original plans. Plus, talking lions always seem to be a crowd favorite.
What is that, you say? Twilight?!? Yeah, yeah. I know, but it's an unavoidable evil. I will be the first to admit that the writing is cheesy beyond belief and feels like it was written in a week, but if there ever was a "crazy obsession that never existed before its time", it's this. Vampires never would have exploded onto the scene as they did and teenage girls around the world would never have known the terms TEAM EDWARD or TEAM JACOB. It's the Justin Bieber of mainstream fiction and mainstream film, but it's worth a #2 spot simply because of its over-exaggerated popularity and breakthrough into yet another sub-genre we never thought existed. But still, vampires and humans romancing it up? GET A ROOM.
Oh that lovable, little lightning bolt-faced boy. He's been put through the ringer at Hogwarts. That's for sure. But, in terms of world building, character development, and plot design, J.K. Rowling really outdid herself on this one. I remember the first time I ever picked up a Harry Potter novel. It was Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone--a wrinkly copy in the library of my middle school. I remember thinking: Look at the cover. This book is gonna suck. Boy, was I wrong. That novel lit me up like a hormone-induced Christmas tree. It was like diving into a world unlike any other and immersing yourself in a culture and a people with a story all their own. You wanted to cry with Harry, laugh with him, stand up for him...hell, do EVERYTHING with him. And each novel got better and better because you knew, as you read, Harry was growing up...and not only growing up, but growing up with you. That, my friends, is the reason why we read. It's like Boy Meets World literary style.












